Beyond such negative controlling measures, a more positive empowering approach based on ethics may also be necessary.What ethical measures need to be taken to address the agency problem?We have just renewed our Co-Op and Damage Allowance with Amazon Vendor on 1/1 and two months later we received the letter stating that they are changing the terms and furthermore, shifting the start date of the agreement.I understand that terms can change, but what bothers us is that the terms of the renewed contract are specified for one year and we have planned our logistics and cost accordingly.This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans.Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. On the ACCC released draft guidelines relating to deferral of arbitrations and backdating of determinations under Part IIIA, for public comment.
Given that, to date, the guidelines have not been tested, the ACCC’s draft view is that substantive changes are not required at this time.
Fourth, we proceed to an analysis of good corporate governance practice involving backdating options based on a series of ethical standards including: (1) trustworthiness; (2) utilitarianism; (3) justice; and (4) Kantianism.
We conclude that while executive compensation schemes (e.g., stock options) were originally intended to help remedy the agency problem by tying together the interests of the executives and shareholders, these schemes may have actually become “part of the problem,” and that the solution ultimately depends upon whether directors and executives accept that all of their actions must be based on a set of core ethical values.
Hi, we have been for a while with Amazon Vendor and overall they are a good experience.
Smart people with a lot of passion for selling / operating the platform.